Business Management Ordinary Legislative Procedure

Question: Describe about the House believes that the United Kingdom should leave the European Union?. Answer: Should UK Leave European Union? The European Union law gets divided into two forms of legislation, the primary legislation, and the secondary legislation. The decisions so made depend on upon the procedure known as the Ordinary Legislative Procedure. The European Union Legislation holds a broad aspect of its application with an effect over the place of implementation. The main reason behind the belief of the House believes for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union is because it weakens the supremacy of the parliament (Butler et al. 2016). The parliamentary sovereignty is supposed to be the fundamental tenets of the British Constitution, which reinforcements the legal system. The European Union contributes to the various ongoing procedure of the Union. So, to debate on the fact whether the United Kingdom must leave the European Union it is important to see different aspects of its properties and the judgments accordingly so as to come to a conclusion. They are: 1. The EU using the British economy: the EU acts as the central government acts in the redistribution from the poor and the affluent areas. Some critics believe that the EU is a drain on the British economy since a huge amount of the money gets allowed for the wasteful spending and the bureaucracy. Nearly 50% of the EU spending goes to the Common Agricultural Policy. 2. The Europeans contribution to the strengthening structure of the democratic: the members elected are within the member states and is a democratic process. Some critics view the opinion that the EU is run by the unelected members and unaccountable elites who holds a huge power (Minford et al.2015). They even misguide the legislative procedure and bring such facts in the legislation that is not voted by the natural parliament. The powers are divided although in a desperate manner yet the citizens get the opportunity for influencing the national policy for their interest with the support of the elected members. 3. Co-operating against the global crime and terror: the EU has a major role to cooperate against the global crime and error. It is believed that the Europol is an effective multi-national police to get the benefits within the country. The critics believe that Europol is an essential medium through which the crime and terror enter the country, and the criminals get the scope to cross the borders. But since the Europol is a strong security, so they get caught. The critics believe that the crimes got the pass through the boundaries due to the UK and its involvement with EU (Gifford 2014). 4. Reintroducing the full powers in the Westminster- the primary role of the EU is not to legislate on the minor issues which are likely to affect the individual nations. The general role of the EU is to interfere in the issues like the foreign policy and the common trade issues (Piris 2016). The critics hold the view that the though the EU holds a parliament, the single state objection does not bring any effect to the EU when the other states are for it. The states do not get veto while a new legislation is decided. References: Butler, G., Dagnis Jensen, M. and Snaith, H., 2016. Slow change may pull us apart: debating a British exit from the European Union.Journal of European Public Policy, pp.1-7. Gifford, C., 2014. The People Against Europe: The Eurosceptic Challenge to the United Kingdom's Coalition Government.JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies,52(3), pp.512-528.s Minford, P., Gupta, S., Le, V.P.M., Mahambare, V. and Xu, Y., 2015.Should Britain leave the EU?: an economic analysis of a troubled relationship. Edward Elgar Publishing. Piris, J.C., 2016. If the UK votes to leave.The seven alternatives to EU membership, Centre for European Reform, London.